The history of Money Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

The history of Money - Assignment Example This is because it made the quantifying of value of goods and services easier. Traders required coins for buying and selling goods, and paying other services such as labor and transport (Davies & Bank 11). The other factor, which facilitated the spread of coin money, is the need for more slaves to work in manufacturing industries. Most of the products were hand made, and this implies that factory owners required more slaves to work in their factories. Factory owners, therefore, required coinage money to buy slaves, as it was the only legal tender available during that time in Greece and other neighboring nations (Davies & Bank 13). Many historians have developed several differences between the Roman Empire and the modern day America. First, the United States was founded on rebellion against British Empire in the name of self-governance and freedom (Davies & Bank 18). While Romans valued their status as masters of the known world, only a few Americans brag their own imperialism. In the ancient times, most people perceived Greece as the world’s superpower, and a nation living in democracy with the ideal liberty, life and happiness. In contrary, most people currently perceive the U.S. as nation trying to force its ways as the world’s superpower (Davies & Bank 19). In term of money, the ancient Roman Empire coin was one of the major trading currencies, along side other currencies such as Greek coin, and the U.S. dollar is also one of the major trading currencies alongside other currencies such s GBP,AUD and JPY (Davies & Bank

The assignment is for Environmental Compliance & Safety class

The is for Environmental Compliance & Safety class - Assignment Example The Clean Air Act enabled United States to enforce laws that meet minimum standards for air quality. The Act requires the EPA to come up with and enforce regulations that guard the general public against exposure to hazardous wastes. Factors determining whether negligence has been involved in releasing hazardous materials into the environment are knowledge of the generator of hazardous material and provisions in the environment laws. A person is said to be negligible in releasing hazardous waste into the environment if he has full knowledge that he generates hazardous waste in his company and goes ahead and release it to the environment without considering its impacts to the environment (Dennison, 1995). Also, a person is negligible if he understands the provisions in Clean Air Act, but contravenes the provisions. Negligent action can be said to be a failure of doing something or observing the degree of care, which is required in the discharging of a responsibility, which the individual charged with negligence ought to have done to the injured party. In this case, the negligent individual is liable to all the problems caused by failing to undertake his responsibility. RCRA categorizes hazardous waste into eight categories, which are ignitable waste, corrosive waste, reactive waste, acute hazardous waste, toxicity characteristic waste, waste from specific and non-specific sources, toxic waste and discarded unused chemical waste. These categories help the RCRA in grouping of the hazardous waste (Dennison, 1995). Furthermore, waste can be categorized using four criteria. These are ignitability, reactivity, corrosivity, and toxicity. Ignitable wastes are those that are flammable when exposed to a source of fire. Reactive wastes are those that react with various elements and compounds in the environment. Corrosive wastes are those wastes that cause wear and tear of substances in the environment. Toxic